I know that this had been an ongoing issue for days. People want rematch in order to prove that the winner should have been the loser and vice versa. Now, here is my opinion - just leave it be. Most of the Pacman fans may be angry at me for saying this but I have my reasons to come up with this opinion:
1. It is just a game. In games, there will be losers and winners. In games, there will be the deserving and the undeserving. Everybody should be a sport and accept that the winner had been announced and that will never change since it is official.
2. The one at fault are not the judges but the rules. The rules are too loose. I think they have to change some things about the mechanics of the game and give more explanation. In my opinion, before the judges make the decision, they should have been given an hour or two hours to review the videos so that their minds would be refreshed and they would not focus on the latter of the game but the former as well.
3. A rematch will just mean more money for others. Yes, there have been claims that the game was fixed. And probably, that is true, even if there is only a small part of it. So, will you take the bait?
4. We should respect who became the winner. Oh c'mon. It was not like Pacman really won his last fight before Bradley, right? Some complained, but it was not much of an issue, enough for a rematch. Why is it that when the winner loses, the game was fixed? Pacman had his time in the limelight. The judges made the decision, don't blame Bradley for it.
Don't get me wrong. I am a fan of Pacman. But that doesn't mean that I have to be biased. These are only my opinions. Why don't you also voice out yours? :D
No comments:
Post a Comment